Compare
ERE registration services compared
Choosing a registration service for the ERE payment on your home charger? Below you find the known providers side by side, with what they charge and what their customers received.
This comparison was compiled by Zeres. The figures come from the providers' own websites, each row shows its reference date.
We assume 5 km per kWh and 3,000 kWh of home charging per year, the same assumptions as the calculator.
- Fee
- 15% excl. VAT (effectively 18.2% incl. VAT)
- Net per year
- €380
- What customers received
- 13.6 cents per kWh
- Payout
- unknown
- Advance
- none
- Contract
- No subscription, stop whenever you want
- Requirements
- Authorisation and connecting the charger
- ZeresThat is us
- Fee
- 19% incl. VAT
- Net per year
- €376
- What customers received
- 12 cents per kWh
- Payout
- quarterly
- Advance
- Advance of 50 percent in July 2026
- Contract
- Per calendar year (mandate per year)
- Requirements
- Charger with a built-in MID meter; read out via OCPP or API, otherwise submitted by you
- Fee
- 20% incl. VAT
- Net per year
- €372
- What customers received
- 12.3 cents per kWh
- Payout
- quarterly
- Advance
- none
- Contract
- Per calendar year, cancel yearly
- Requirements
- MID meter, or OCPP via ocpp.joulo.nl
Spotted a mistake? Email us
How we compare
Every provider is calculated with the same kilometres, the same ERE price and the same NEa formula. Only the fee differs. A percentage a provider quotes excluding VAT is converted to including VAT, because as a consumer you pay VAT on the fee.
The column What customers received shows the amount per kWh a provider publishes itself for a completed period. That says more than the percentage: the sale price of the certificates differs per provider. If a provider publishes nothing, the column says not published.
Other comparisons you can consult: energienerds.nl, keuze.nl and laadpas.net. They compare independently of us. energienerds.nl, keuze.nl, laadpas.net